Another HIV microbicide a bust
By Andrea Gawrylewski (The scientist.com/blog) 18 February 2008: Another microbicide to prevent HIV transmission has been deemed ineffective.
The Population Council, a nonprofit research organization, which has
been developing the microbicide Carraguard, announced today that phase
III clinical results show it ineffective in preventing HIV
transmission.
The trial, which ended in March of last year, involved 6,202 women and
cost around $40 million. Of the 3,103 participants who were using the
microbicide gel, 134 became infected with the virus while on the trial,
as opposed to 151 out of 3,099 who were using a placebo. These results
are not statistically significant, Khatija Ahmed, from the University
of Limpopo in South Africa, and principal investigator of the trial,
said in a telephone press conference last Thursday (February 14).
Microbicides to prevent HIV have had a rough ride on the path to
development, and there are currently none approved for use as anti-HIV
agents. Last year, the phase III clinical trial for an anti-HIV
microbicide called Ushercell was halted when initial data suggested
that it increased the risk for infection.
Carraguard is a clear gel that, when applied to the vagina, is supposed
to block pathogens from reaching epithelium cells.
But the Carraguard results won't put an end to microbicide development,
Robin Maguire, director of microbicides product development at the
Population Council's Center for Biomedical Research, said during the
press conference call. "We will be developing the next generation of
products using Carraguard; this study did demonstrate its safety," she
said. In particular, the organization is hoping to start a phase I
clinical trial this year of a microbicide that is a combination of
Carraguard and an antiretroviral, MIV-150. In vitro testing has shown
the antiretroviral to be more stable in the Carraguard gel than an
inert gel.
Of all participants who enrolled in the trial about 69% completed it in
full, and only about 10% used the gel 100% of the time. Researchers are
continuing to analyze these results to determine if low adherence might
have played into the efficacy results.

