Microbicide gel may help against HIV
By Meredith Wadman (Nature) 10 February 2009: After years of disappointments, AIDS r esearchers on 9 February announced the first preliminary results from a trial in which a vaginal microbicide seemed to reduce HIV infection. But experts caution that the findings fall shy of being statistically significant; a definitive answer will need to await the conclusion, later this year, of a much larger trial of the same microbicide.
http://www.nature.com/news/2009/090210/full/news.2009.91.html
The results were released at the Conference on Retroviruses and
Opportunistic Infections in Montreal. The study involved 3,099 women in
five countries -- four of them in sub-Saharan Africa, where women
comprise nearly 60% of HIV-infected adults. Women assigned to use the
microbicide Pro 2000 before sex experienced a 30% reduction in
incidence of HIV infection compared with those who used a different
microbicide, a placebo gel, or no gel at all.
The vaginal gel was tested against another microbicide, a placebo gel,
and no gel at all.Microbicide Trials Network
To be statistically significant, the Pro 2000 group would have had to
experience a 33% reduction in incidence of infection.
"This is not a slam dunk by any means," says Anthony Fauci, the
director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
in Bethesda, Maryland. "It is encouraging only in the sense that it is
trending in the right direction."
The study's lead investigator, Salim Abdool Karim of the Centre for the
AIDS Programme of Research in Congella, South Africa, says that the
work, "while not conclusive, provides a glimmer of hope to millions of
women at risk for HIV, especially young women in Africa."
"This study has provided the first proof of concept that an agent
applied in the vagina by women can reduce their risk of HIV
acquisition," says Sharon Hillier of the University of Pittsburgh,
principal investigator of the Microbicide Trials Network, under whose
auspices the trial was run.
Looking for a break
Other experts say that the overall 30% reduction in infections in Pro
2000 users, although an encouraging number, may be an idealized one.
"This is a clinical trial where people are highly motivated to
participate and adhere to the product that they are being given. What
will happen in the real world?" asks Mark Wainberg, the director of the
McGill AIDS Centre in Montreal.
Others add that the study should be judged in the context of
microbicide trials until now, which have been singularly disappointing.
For instance, in 2007, a late-stage trial of cellulose sulfate was
halted after preliminary results indicated that it could lead to an
increased risk of HIV infection. "When the microbicide field has, all
too often in the past, seen more infections in the intervention arm
than the placebo, the reaction has been to say that it's statistically
insignificant, could have arisen by chance and means very little. The
same applies in the converse scenario," says John Moore, an AIDS
researcher at Weill Medical College of Cornell University in New York
City.
Pro 2000 is made by Indevus Pharmaceuticals of Lexington,
Massachusetts, and works by inhibiting HIV entry into cells. It is also
being tested in a trial sponsored by the UK's Medical Research Council
(MRC) and Department for International Development.
That study is due to conclude in August, involves nearly 9,400 women, a
large enough group to deliver a clear answer on the microbicide's
efficacy. "This may ultimately turn out to be effective," says Fauci.
But "the only way you're going to get an answer is the ongoing
MRC-sponsored trial."
Karim says that if a 30% to 40% efficacy rate were to be documented in
the MRC trial, that would be "compelling".

