Study shows signs of slow progress in the search for an HIV microbicide
By Donald G. McNeil Jr. (New York Times) 16 February 2009: Finding a microbicide is one of the thorniest problems in AIDS research.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/17/health/17glob.html?_r=2&ref=science
Women in poor countries need a vaginal gel that blocks the AIDS
virus but not sperm because many still want children. They also need
one that can be inserted secretly: for too many women, any action that
implies that a partner is infected is likely to result in a
beating.
And men who have sex with men may well need a microbicide that works
rectally.
Previous trials of microbicides had to be stopped when they proved
ineffective or even made women more likely to become infected. New
research presented in Montreal last week suggested that progress is
being made, but slowly.
In a study supported by the National Institutes of Health, a new gel
called Pro 2000 was tested in 3,099 women in Africa and the United
States. It appeared to protect them 30 percent better than a placebo,
but researchers are awaiting results of a British study on 9,000
women.
Gels containing one or two antiretroviral drugs, tenofovir and FTC,
were tested in monkeys. They appeared to give 100 percent protection —
but researchers cautioned that only six monkeys got each gel, that the
gels had high doses of drugs, and that what works with simian virus in
monkeys does not always work in humans.
Oral doses of tenofovir appeared to partly protect monkeys from rectal
exposure to the virus. Many studies of prophylactic tenofovir are under
way in humans.

